| News |

In the Zoning, or: Someone Dipped Their Dallas City Council in My Ethics Reform.

Keep Dallas Observer Free
I Support
  • Local
  • Community
  • Journalism
  • logo

Support the independent voice of Dallas and help keep the future of Dallas Observer free.

The council's talking ethics reform again this morning -- specifically, lobbyist registration, restrictions on campaign contributions and how the council votes on zoning cases. I believe Jim handled the first part of this, oh, 'bout six weeks ago -- recommended reading for those in need of a refresher. (Long story short: "The idea of Leppert as the champion of reform goes down hard." Frankly, I'm a Calvin and Hobbes man myself.) As for campaign contributions, well, the proposal on the table would disallow council members from getting dough while a zoning case is under consideration or 60 days after its dispensation -- because after 60 days there's no way the money could be tied to a specific zoning case, right? Right.

As for the zoning requirement, City Attorney Tom Perkins has drafted an amendment to the Dallas City Code that changes how cases are yay'ed or nay'ed around the City Hall horseshoe. As in:

7.13. Motions to Approve Zoning Cases.

(a) A main motion to approve or deny a zoning case must be seconded three times, with each second made by a different city council member. By seconding the motion, the city council member represents that he or she has reviewed the facts of the zoning case and has developed an opinion on the appropriateness of the zoning.

(b) For purposes of this subsection, "zoning case" means an item listed on a city council public hearing agenda for an application to change the zoning on a specific property, including authorization of any hearing to determine proper zoning, straight zoning, zoning-related deed restrictions, specific use permits, planned development districts, historic districts, conservation districts, neighborhood stabilization overlays, and similar zoning applications.

I think Schutze is planning to attend morning's meeting. But that may just be for the briefing involving "alley closure service requests." Why? That's his business.

Keep the Dallas Observer Free... Since we started the Dallas Observer, it has been defined as the free, independent voice of Dallas, and we would like to keep it that way. Offering our readers free access to incisive coverage of local news, food and culture. Producing stories on everything from political scandals to the hottest new bands, with gutsy reporting, stylish writing, and staffers who've won everything from the Society of Professional Journalists' Sigma Delta Chi feature-writing award to the Casey Medal for Meritorious Journalism. But with local journalism's existence under siege and advertising revenue setbacks having a larger impact, it is important now more than ever for us to rally support behind funding our local journalism. You can help by participating in our "I Support" membership program, allowing us to keep covering Dallas with no paywalls.

We use cookies to collect and analyze information on site performance and usage, and to enhance and customize content and advertisements. By clicking 'X' or continuing to use the site, you agree to allow cookies to be placed. To find out more, visit our cookies policy and our privacy policy.


Join the Observer community and help support independent local journalism in Dallas.


Join the Observer community and help support independent local journalism in Dallas.