The Battle Over Airport Contracts Opens a Rift Between the Mayor and Minority City Council Members.

Gilbert Aranza darts down two flights of stairs from the offices of Star Concessions Ltd. into Dallas Love Field Airport's main lobby. "It's my daily exercise," the 57-year-old explains as he shoots by an elevator on the third floor and then skips an escalator ride on the second, "and a way to keep my eyes on employees."

Gilbert Aranza thought he had a contract extension in place to provide food and beverage concessions at Dallas Love Field Airport until Mayor Tom Leppert decided that he wanted the contract put out for bids.
BrandonThibodeaux
Gilbert Aranza thought he had a contract extension in place to provide food and beverage concessions at Dallas Love Field Airport until Mayor Tom Leppert decided that he wanted the contract put out for bids.
Aranza examines his wall of rejected proposals from other cities, some of which he claims are proof that the bidding process isn’t always fair.
BrandonThibodeaux
Aranza examines his wall of rejected proposals from other cities, some of which he claims are proof that the bidding process isn’t always fair.

Aranza, the grandson of Mexican immigrants, has reason to hustle. He oversees 200 employees (of which 90 percent are minorities or women) and 10 eateries dishing food to hurried travelers passing through Love Field on their way out of town—folks like the man wearing boots and a cowboy hat who hoists a guitar over the railing of Chili's Too before he sits down and orders a burger and beer. Aranza expanded the Chili's to accommodate travelers' growing desire for sit-down meals, and he seems to have landed a happy customer in the cowboy. The man huffs out a great sigh after his first sip of beer, while nearby, a young woman drops a large duffle bag on the floor to put cream in her coffee at Cinnabon.

Star's the franchisee for both these food stops, and the money his hungry customers shell out feeds both Aranza's and the airport's bottom lines. Because Aranza pays rent based on a percentage of his sales, the better his business, the more money flows to keep Love Field running smoothly.

Business at Love these days is booming, but that wasn't always the case.

As Aranza disappears into a sea of potential customers, it's hard to imagine that this busy airport was once so moribund that the city tried to turn it into a kind of amusement park with wings. In 1975, the city leased space to an ice rink, video arcade, bowling alley, roller rink and movie theaters to fill the void left by air carriers that had bolted a year earlier for the recently completed Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport.

Southwest Airlines was alone in fighting to remain at Love Field, and its successful effort allowed the airport to avoid a fate as the Llove Entertainment Complex, which closed in 1978. Now arguably the airline industry's most profitable carrier with 37 consecutive years in the black, Southwest is primed to reap the benefits of the $519 million airport facelift scheduled for completion in October 2014. That's also when the Wright Amendment—federal legislation passed in 1979 that restricted flights from Love Field to states other than those bordering Texas—will be fully phased out.

Bustling today, Love Field is set to explode in the years ahead, with the number of passengers passing through annually expected to double from 4 million to 8 million by 2021. Aranza, whose award-winning Star Concessions has operated the food businesses at Love since 1996, weathered the travel bust after 9/11 and brought in national chain restaurants to improve the quality of food. Now, he thinks he's earned the right to benefit from the coming explosion. And because he's operating during the construction period, which includes tearing down the current terminal and erecting a state-of-the-art replacement in phases, Aranza says an extension on his lease with the city will allow him to recoup any losses.

For a while, after nearly three years of negotiations and debate through its Transportation and Environment Committee, the Dallas City Council seemed to agree. By a 10-0 vote on February 22, the committee recommended extending Aranza's contract, which expires in June 2011, through the construction period in 2014 and then added another 12 years with one three-year option. Hudson Group, which operates the airport's retail concessions, would receive the same deal.

Unfortunately for Aranza, Mayor Tom Leppert had other ideas. On March 3 he asked city staff, who had backed the extensions, to appear before the full council and explain why the contracts weren't put out for competitive bids.

The Dallas Morning News jumped in with a series of stories leading up to the scheduled April 28 vote by the full council. The stories criticized the no-bid process and repeatedly mentioned Aranza's campaign contributions to council members and his tenure as a director of the Dallas Citizens Council, a powerful consortium made up mostly of white businessmen.

The paper also questioned whether the city was getting the best deal it could with Hudson, another company wired politically and supported by some on the council because it's 40 percent minority-owned. Multiplex, a company owned by state Representative Helen Giddings, has a 25 percent stake in the newsstands and sunglasses stores at Love through a local joint venture with Hudson, one of the country's most well-known airport concessionaires. A blind trust that controls U.S. Representative Eddie Bernice Johnson's assets owns 15 percent. Giddings and Johnson, who are black, became part of Hudson Retail Dallas six years after Hudson's initial contract was unanimously approved by the council. Giddings refused to comment for this story other than stating that she started her business in 1989—three years before her election to the Texas House. Dena Craig, a spokesperson for Johnson, says Johnson has no information about the concessions at Love Field because she has no control over the trust.

Leppert's efforts and the onslaught of bad press surrounding the contracts caused the council to delay its April 28 vote and form an ad hoc committee to evaluate the issue, but after three committee meetings, the city council appears deadlocked. In fact, the two-hour sessions only strengthened the resolve of both Leppert, who says it's the city's duty to seek bids on contracts this large, and the council's black and Latino members, who maintain that the concessionaires should be compensated for their losses stemming from the post-9/11 travel slowdown and the additional costs associated with operating during construction.

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | Next Page >>
 
  • El Tejano 12/03/2010 4:35:00 AM

    Gilbert Aranza is a WETBACK, deport his greasy ass.

  • Allan 06/29/2010 5:41:00 PM

    WOW!! Who would have thought that Dallas politicians would own some of the companies that are at Love Field!! Now you think we are stupid enough to believe because some of the Councilmen and US Representative have trusts with the companies, that they have no control over the companies and no control over who gets the contracts? Then I have some waterfront property in Arizona that I want to sell to you!!! This is nothing but a scam using the fact the companies are minority owned and should get a break in the bid process. That is complete BS!! This is against the law for any of the politicians to voted on projects or plans or programs that they have a financial interest in. It is CONFLICT OF INTEREST!! They should be kicked out of office. We need to let the Mayor do his job and have a open bid process.

  • John r 06/23/2010 1:29:00 AM

    This should be an open bid to everyone....who said it is an exclusive right just for minorities...get real minorities you not the only ones living on this planet.

  • becca 06/22/2010 7:49:00 AM

    First of all if the contracts have already been awarded there should not be any issues. A leader can't just change his or her mind nor forget previous votes. Second there are employees with the company that may loose jobs. If business is good leave it alone.

  • ALL I HAVE TO SAY... 06/21/2010 4:14:00 PM

    Well said I agree with that motion as well. ALL I HAVE TO SAY ABOUT THIS IS- APPROVE THE EXTENSION! APPROVE THE EXTENSION! APPROVE THE EXTENSION! APPROVE THE EXTENSION! APPROVE THE EXTENSION! APPROVE THE EXTENSION! APPROVE THE EXTENSION! APPROVE THE EXTENSION! APPROVE THE EXTENSION! APPROVE THE EXTENSION! APPROVE THE EXTENSION! APPROVE THE EXTENSION!

  • Approve the Extension 06/21/2010 4:09:00 PM

    I agree with W THOMAS HAWMAN JR, well said my friend. Don't he have bigger fish to fry instead of causing trouble for the little people? When is Leppert's term over? Get him outta there!

  • W THOMAS HAWMAN JR 06/19/2010 2:43:00 AM

    IF IT AINT BROKE, DONT FIX IT... IF THERES NO CURRENT ISSUES WITH THE CURRENT PROPRIETOR, LEAVE IT BE... JUST ANOTHER WAY FOR THE CITY OF DALLAS (SPECIFICALLY ITS MAYOR, MR LEPPERT) TO GO AND SCREW UP SOMETHING WHERE THERE WAS NOTHING WRONG WITH THE WAY IT WAS BEING RUN IN THE FIRST PLACE. THERE ARE MUCH MORE PRESSING ISSUES FACING THE MAYOR AND THE DALLAS CITY COUNCIL. SCREWING AROUND WITH CONCESSIONS AT LOVE FIELD IS ONLY GOING TO COST THE CITY MORE MONEY (THAT IT DOESNT HAVE) AND WASTE MORE TIME (WHICH IT ALSO DOESNT HAVE.) LEPPERT NEEDS TO PRIORITIZE AND MESSING WITH THINGS THAT ARENT A PRESSING ISSUE IS NO WAY TO RUN THIS CITY ANYWHERE BUT INTO THE GROUND.... WHICH HE APPARENTLY HAS A GOOD GRASP OF DOING (TRINITY RIVER PROJECT, PEGASUS PROJECT, AND THE CONVENTION CENTER HOTEL (WHICH THE LATTER IS A MISTAKE ON SO MANY LEVELS (BUT THEN ARENT THEY ALL!)))

  • Bondable Cactus 06/18/2010 8:27:00 AM

    Wylie H. I think you have been pretty unfair the these concessionaires. They won their contracts through a bid process. They won those contract from a company that had those contracts for 37 years. They didn't come to the airport in its heyday, far from it. These local minority owned operators were given a tiny piece of an old crumbling pie and they did a great job and delivered award winning service. I know Mr. Aranza. The man has worked for and earned everything he has ever gotten. What insider deal did he ever get? I have news for you Wylie H., Hispanics don't get the inside deals in this city. Never have. And while you rant about this contract extension and try smear these operators your mayor is working on the real inside deal. A deal that will reward him and an out of state contributor with a cut going to Willis Johnson for being the local minority front guy. Is that good for Dallas? Really? The city is working for an extension because they think it is a good deal for the city and for no other reason. Isn't that what we want? the best deal? the least risk? You seem to be hung up on the people but isn't it the deal that really matter?

  • Betty Culbreath 06/18/2010 7:29:00 AM

    I'm not sure why DFW comes up,doing Love Field discussion.First DFW has a Concession policy, approved by is Board of Managers. Secondly ,DFW has a 10 year cap on concession contracts.Thirdly you need to clarify that 65% no. in relationship to DFW,my belief is that no. is to high.

  • A Citizen of Dallas 06/17/2010 11:55:00 PM

    As a citizen of Dallas and a frequent buisness flier of Southwest, I would be very saden to know that Mr.Aranza will no longer head up the majority of Love Field Concessions. Sadly this makes me look down on Tom (and to think I voted for him as our mayor). I always get great service and a smiling face when I sit down to grab a bite to eat between flights there at Love. The food is great and I never have to worry about slow service since I'm always in a rush. Yes I agree shame on you Mr.Mayor, what's in this for you and tell me what other person is out just dying to take the contract away from Mr.Aranza?

  • 06/17/2010 7:23:00 PM

    Just sell the damn airport and let the new owner choose sub-contractors. Their is no reason for the City of Dallas to own an airport. Next they'll want us to own a hotel.

  • MikeLDFW 06/17/2010 5:26:00 PM

    Would someone please remind Mayor Leppert that we voted the "Strong Mayor" proposal down.

  • Love Lost 06/17/2010 2:40:00 PM

    Poor WylieH has been trying to understand this deal - wait, he has been trying to make it what he wants it to sound like. I can't figure out if he is unable to understand plain English or "carrying the Mayor's water." Sam, this article points out the real reasons the mayor pulled this at the final hour. His arguments were dreamed up at the last minute and he had his friends at DFW (of course he's on the board there) help him with some facts that, if twisted, could support his arguments. Nasty politics at best. Shame on him and shame on the Morning News for helping him in this scheme. A fraud has been perpetrated on the Dallas public and we should all be angry to be so manipulated. Though none should be so angry as the City staff, the Transportation committee members, and the City's consultants - all of whom the mayor threw under the bus.

  • One more thing 06/17/2010 2:28:00 PM

    This is really interesting. If Hunt and the other seven council members who back the city staff proposal can forge a coalition they can finally break the Mayor's grip on the city council. No more kissing the mayor's you know what, no more carrying his water. They would be in control. Just a thought. The mayor may learn from this experience that as a politician he really isn't ready for prime time.

  • Don Abbott 06/17/2010 12:33:00 PM

    Does American Airlines now about all of this? If not, be SURE to have them approve anything that will make Love a real airport. Think about it, the Wright Amendment was THE single most successful public/private fraud of all-time. Only the upcoming health care slick will eclipse it. Forget the stadium in Arlington, Laura Miller's true legacy was that she cratered at the bargaining table and gave American even more time to control a top five domestic aviation market.

  • 06/17/2010 12:10:00 PM

    Sam, I have to say, you really lost me with this article. Neither the likability of Gilbert Aranza nor a perceived lack of integrity on the part of the Mayor should justify the award of a several hundred million dollar monopoly franchise without any sort of competitive process whatsoever. All that should matter is what's best for the citizens of Dallas, who seem to forever be tossed aside in the process.

  • Jeanne 06/17/2010 6:32:00 AM

    I do not believe that anyone should have a 'forever' monopoly on any City [or any other] owned franchise. Let everyone who wants to try to win the contract have a go at it. Perhaps, the current contractors will be victorious even with competition. What is all of the hoopla about?

  • Keepiing It Real 06/17/2010 6:05:00 AM

    Great article Sam. Very insightful. The Mayor obviously misled Council members. How can such a smart man "forget" his vote on a critical issue more than once? The chair and vice chair of the Transportation has to answer the question "Why did you change your position?" Sam, you just made an interesting situation more interesting to say the least.

  • jd 06/17/2010 5:10:00 AM

    Gilbert Aranza is a Harvard educated lawyer living in University Park, should he really be getting "minority" set asides?

  • Clancey 06/17/2010 5:03:00 AM

    Helen was with a concession group called the Accomodations and Eddie had a partnership with Host Marriot. They both had contract at DFW Airport. ---------- What did they pay for 40% of the Hudson contract? Sweat equity?

  • Political sit rep 06/17/2010 4:07:00 AM

    Thanks Sam for a great article. Here is the politcal fallout. Leppert won't run again. There are no more big projects to do just budgets to cut. Now that the media is focused on his consultants getting rich and his confusion over his own votes his hopes of moving up the political ladder are pretty much over. Ron Natinsky wants to run for mayor but can forget having any minority support after carrying the mayor's water and dumping on the minority leaders he needs to win. To say they are pissed off would be the understatement of the year. Angela Hunt has the opportunity to do the right thing, stick a fork in the mayor and win the support she needs if she wants to run for mayor. Love Field will be an old issue by the time the next election comes around but minority leaders won't forget who supported them and who screwed them on this deal. Council members who praised the contracts only to change their votes will be portrayed as flip-floppers who can't be effective without help from the mayor. While incumbents usually don't lose why put yourself in that position? Bottom line- the mayor has shown he is too thin skinned for big time politics. He received some bad political advice and wasn't smart enough to see the cow pie he was stepping in. As for the Dallas Morning News. They took an initial position without knowing all the facts - so what else is new. They are less and less influential.

  • Joyce Foreman 06/17/2010 3:51:00 AM

    Helen was with a concession group called the Accomodations and Eddie had a partnership with Host Marriot. They both had contract at DFW Airport.

  • Clancey 06/17/2010 3:22:00 AM

    I've asked repeatedly, the defenders of the deal won't answer, the claim is EBJ and HG were in the concession business prior to getting into politics, well before they suddenly owned 40% of the Hudson deal. Where? When? How much did they pay Hudson for 40%? Interesting, nobody on the Council dares ask those Q's. They know what the answer is, so do you. Answer those questions, then we'll move on to whether a 19 year contract for anything is wise.

  • cityofdallaschampion 06/17/2010 2:40:00 AM

    Sam, did you look into Concessions International ownership structure. They are owned by HJ Russell - Atlanta based construction company. You may want to follow that trail, if you haven't already done so. I think Ed Oakley has hit the nail.......

  • Mr Lucky 06/17/2010 1:45:00 AM

    The concessions and shops at Love Field are on-par with the Detroit Airport - crummy. Now we see why.

  • Airportman 06/17/2010 1:28:00 AM

    Hopefully Ms. Hunt will have an opportunity to review more of the facts before she decides whether to side with the mayor on this issue. The proposed contracts protect the city's interests, including provisions to receive higher rents should there be higher bids for the space that is going out for RFP. Gilbert Aranza has clearly demonstrated that the prime spots are not going to the incumbents in the new terminal. I would question whether those who claim they will only bid on the whole terminal actually have the finacial strength and proven track record to do so or are they just blowing smoke? Politically the Mayor has gotten everything he needs from minority members of the council. He can now afford to throw them under the bus to try to gain support from Republicans for a bid for higher office. Anyone foolish enough to side with him should remember that there is room under the bus for them once the mayor is done with them.

 

Most Popular Stories

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy